A little more than 24 hours after it became painfully clear just what the Conservatives had achieved in the general election, there is already a developing sense of buyer’s remorse. Apparently almost 2400 new members have joined the Liberal Democrats since polls closed. This is obviously a good thing, although perhaps it just reflects the endless propensity of British people to back a plucky underdog.
But it was striking already across both old and new media yesterday how subdued the response to the prospect of five years of majority Tory rule was. There was limited triumphalism from newspapers that had mostly advocated some species of continued coalition or power-sharing arrangement. And the response on Twitter – certainly from people I follow, who are not all Lib Dems by any means – was quite sceptical.
People are belatedly poring over the Conservative Manifesto to find all the horrors within that might now become a reality. Certainly there are some big, beastly policies that spring out immediately which would never, ever have happened under a continued Tory/Lib Dem arrangement. These include:
- Abolition of the Human Rights Act
Because we, the people, like governments actively to reduce the number of rights available to us as citizens…
- £30 billion in further cuts, including £12 billion from welfare – the so-called “rollercoaster” of public spending cuts that will be deeper and more rapid than anything between 2010-2015
Because we, the people, like governments actively to reduce the quality and breadth of public services available to us as citizens on the basis of an arbitrary numerical target…
- No increases in the vast majority of tax rates
Because we, the people, would rather see the government hack away at vital services than ask us – or our wealthier friends – to pay a bit more to the Treasury…
- “Abolish” long-term youth unemployment
This is code for the following policies: tougher Day One Work Requirements for jobseekers; introduction of a “Youth Allowance” to replace JSA for 18-21 year olds that forces them to take an apprenticeship, traineeship or do “community work” for their benefits; remove automatic entitlement to Housing Benefit.
Because we, the people, think the best way for new adults to start in life is through a combination of embarrassing and demoralising situations. Work for your benefits and live with your parents into adulthood.
- Introduce a 50% workforce threshold for strike action, and make it harder for staff in health, education, fire and transport to strike
This will presumably be known as the No Bob Crow Bill. Other policies include the removal of restrictions banning employers from hiring cover during strikes – at a stroke, undermining the whole point of industrial action.
Because we, the people, want our employers to have even more power over us – the balance at the moment is far too much towards us, the bolshy workers.
- We will give Parliament the opportunity to repeal the Hunting Act on a free vote
Because we, the people, feel this is a sensible use of government and Parliamentary time in the 21st century. And because we like using hounds to kill foxes.
- We will make EU migrants live here for four years without claiming any benefits
Because we, the people, want to benefit from the presence of people who “work hard and get on” without having to protect them if anything bad happens to them, like if they lose their job – you know, the one a lot of British people wouldn’t want to have to do.
- “Deport first, appeal later”
This rule will be extended to all immigration appeals and judicial reviews, including where a so-called right to family life is involved. Satellite tracking will also be introduced for every foreign national offender subject to an outstanding deportation order or deportation proceedings.
Because we, the people, care more about getting rid of suspicious-looking foreigners than ensuring they have a right to fair treatment and due process.
- Introduce new powers to force coasting schools to accept new leadership
Because we, the people, think the best way to make schools better is always to force them to change their leadership. Because problems always start at the top, and nothing can be blamed upon, say, social deprivation or the lack of buy-in from rich parents who can move to be nearer good schools.
- We will address the unfairness of the current Parliamentary boundaries and reduce the number of MPs to 600
We’ll also introduce “votes for life” for expatriates who live abroad permanently, meaning all those angry people who spend their days on the Costa del Sol, whinging about the country they left, will be able to have an influence on future elections.
Because we, the people, think changes to our electoral system should be left in the hands of whoever won the last election, so that they can make sure the changes made benefit them as a party.
- We will force Housing Associations to sell their stock at a discount
Extending the Right to Buy to tenants of housing associations? It’s just the beginning. Let’s also extend Help to Buy, give people free money if they’re saving for a deposit, and protect the Green Belt.
We pay lip service to building more bloody houses, but that takes a long time whereas all of these super-popular policies can be done pretty much straight away.
Because we, the people, know that the best way to solve a shortage of a thing is to increase demand for that thing. It’s simple economics.
- An end to new onshore windfarms
We’ll stop public subsidy for these because they often fail to win public support (but, strikingly, not always).
Because we, the people, like a clear view of our electricity pylons, thank you very much.
- We will allow security services to know everything they want to about communications data – the Snoopers’ Charter
And we’ll do “whatever is necessary” to protect the British people.
Because we, the people, are happy for the government to know who we’re talking to, where, when and how. None of that is remotely intrusive as long as they aren’t actually reading the messages themselves.
- We’ll stop taxing people when they inherit wealth up to £1 million
People should absolutely have the right to have £1 million dropped into their lap without having done a stroke of work to earn it.
Because we, the people, think the best way to make sure everyone in society benefits is to make it easier for aggregated riches to be retained solely by the extremely wealthy.
But does a majority actually mean the Tories will be able to push forward with all of this stuff?
The answer is probably – and hopefully – no. The Conservatives have won a very small majority of 12. That’s worse than John Major’s in 1992, which was 21.
The difficulty of maintaining discipline in such a Parliament cannot be underestimated. But I think it will be worse than it was even for Major. Thanks to the Coalition, the Tory backbenchers from 2010-2015 have had relative freedom to rebel, safe in the knowledge that the majority created by the stability of Conservative/Lib Dem agreement would be sufficient to pass government legislation.
That safety net no longer exists. So what you now have are right-wing Tory backbenchers hungry for red meat – and with a track record of rebellion. The Conservatives’ whipping operation, which was hardly rock solid towards the end of the last Parliament, will become critically important now. The question is whether Michael Gove (the current Chief Whip) or his replacement will be up to the challenge.
On the other hand, these right-wingers will be pulling the party further in the direction of Euroscepticism, spending cuts, and general nastiness. There are few notable exceptions: David Davis, for instance, will continue to fight the good fight on civil liberties, and there might be a small group that joins him. They might be able to get in the way of things like the Communications Data Bill.
But realistically, we should be afraid of what this government is likely to try to do. Against an opposition in disarray, even a strident backbench voice might not be too difficult to quell. Decent people need to mobilise fast against some of the worst aspects of this agenda.
4 thoughts on “What an “unfettered” Tory government might actually mean”
….. I’ m one of the 2400 ! Re-joined after 5 years (resetting my political compass) – when the wipe out was declared.
Liberalism needs to claimed/reclaimed within the Lib Dems first – then the public …….
Dont expect a quiet member/activist ………..
I would suggest your judgment on these things is compromised. On LDV you suggested Vince Cable had a great record of improving workers’ rights in government. What planet are you living on?
Are you completely unaware of the doubling of the unfair dismissal continuity of service requirement? The massive impositions of administrative burdens and red tapes on trade unions alone (burdens that no other voluntary organisations are required to bear… that is fundamentally illiberal), and slashing the length of consultation periods for unfair dismissal.
How is that improving workers’ rights?
Vince was responsible for several policies and reviews aimed at enhancing workers’ rights, including the banning of exclusivity clauses in zero hours contracts and the expansion of statutory and shared parental leave.
He also consistently opposed attempts by the Tories to make it more difficult to strike, which is what they will now do as a majority government.
Critically, he also stood against the Beecroft report’s proposals on no-fault dismissal, and watered down Shares for Rights to such an extent that take-up was minimal.
I’m not suggesting everything he did was great, or that he stopped all the bad things proposed by the Tories, but he was a fine Business Secretary who found a good balance between employers and employees.
Thanks for your comment,
Pingback: What Kind of Leader Do the Liberal Democrats Need? | Never Cruel Nor Cowardly